<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VoIP-Point &#187; qos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.voip-point.net/tag/qos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.voip-point.net</link>
	<description>Voice Over IP News and Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:08:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Routers for VoIP QoS</title>
		<link>http://www.voip-point.net/2008/06/27/routers-for-voip-qos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.voip-point.net/2008/06/27/routers-for-voip-qos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>voipmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vonage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m0n0wall bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[throttling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrt54g]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voip-point.net/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slashdot has a current discussion about which domestic router is best for Quality of Service (QOS) provision for Voice over IP. The original question posed is by someone using a Linksys WRT54G wireless broadband router with Bittorrent and other high-bandwidth applications to consider. Unfortunately, the WRT54G isn&#8217;t quite cutting it when used alongside Vonage. Inevitably [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slashdot has a <a href="http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/08/06/26/2156201.shtml" target="_blank">current discussion</a> about which domestic router is best for Quality of Service (QOS) provision for Voice over IP.</p>
<p>The original question posed is by someone using a Linksys WRT54G wireless broadband router with Bittorrent and other high-bandwidth applications to consider. Unfortunately, the WRT54G isn&#8217;t quite cutting it when used alongside Vonage.</p>
<p>Inevitably for Slashdot, there is some gravitation toward open-source products. Open firmware for the WRT54G is suggested by some while another comment mentions that <a href="http://m0n0.ch/" target="_blank">m0n0wall</a>, an open-source firewall VPN distribution, can be deployed on relatively low-end commodity hardware and provides the type of QoS required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voip-point.net/2008/06/27/routers-for-voip-qos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VoIP, QoS and old kit</title>
		<link>http://www.voip-point.net/2008/03/19/voip-qos-and-old-kit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.voip-point.net/2008/03/19/voip-qos-and-old-kit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>voipmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prioritisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pros and cons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality of service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voip-point.net/2008/03/19/voip-qos-and-old-kit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alkahest has an interesting bit on the &#8216;pros and cons&#8217; (but mainly cons) of Voice over IP in what sounds like a large oganisation when you have to switch over to using old kit that doesn&#8217;t support QoS in quite the way you need. QoS or Quality of Service is a prioritisation concept for network [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alkahest has an <a href="http://www.fenris.org/2008/03/19/pros-and-cons-of-voip/" target="_blank">interesting bit</a> on the &#8216;pros and cons&#8217; (but mainly cons) of Voice over IP in what sounds like a large oganisation when you have to switch over to using old kit that doesn&#8217;t support QoS in quite the way you need.</p>
<p>QoS or Quality of Service is a prioritisation concept for network traffic which is especially critical for Voice over IP. If your network packets can&#8217;t get through then neither can your calls.</p>
<p>The point is also made that your VoIP suppliers, if the must also be your support, must be good at actually helping you rather than just selling you products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voip-point.net/2008/03/19/voip-qos-and-old-kit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

